firearms? No, Driver's Civilization
E 'yesterday's news, the kind that now no longer clamor of a pensioner who killed his wife Brindisi, it would appear without sufficient reason, with two rounds of shotgun. of the other that two days ago killed at Genoa, with a 9 caliber automatic, two guards zoophilic notified that a penalty for the alleged mistreatment of some dogs. And yet that sixty-Novigrad (RC), seven days ago, shot and his mother and older brother to family disputes. And so on. Every day, at least every week, we hear of murders, wife-murder, of people, especially family, loses her mind and kills family, relatives and acquaintances. Murders that occur with greater frequency because, in our humble opinion, more people possess weapons. "For the carrying of a weapon for personal defense must be of legal age and have a valid reason and reasons justifying the need to go armed."
Source: http://poliziadistato.it/articolo/308-Licenza_di_porto_di_arma_per_difesa_personale
There is a need to go armed. It 's inevitable, however, the realization that this need leads directly to the potential possibility that you shoot and consequently kill. For this reason, you get used to the news of murders that certainly does not make any more fuss. Murders that could be limited if it increases, between citizens, the awareness that it is not necessary to have weapons to defend themselves, American films and shows as often popular nationalist, but would be essential to avoid more and more carnage, to teach men, right from primary schools, civic education, respect for others, freedom of speech of others, the right to acceptance of this criticism. More than firearms, for some people, it would take the Driver's Civilization: a license authorizing certain persons to live in society. We can not resort to arms to be stupid, let alone die for the stupidity of others. E 'required by the legislature on a tight regulations that currently govern the issuing of firearms, both it for protection, use and hunting and sporting use. Yes, because there are not only those who possess weapons for personal defense weapons but also those who use them to hunt, then that is nothing more than to kill poor animals whose only wrong have to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. And then those who are "sport" at the shooting range. But it would be more satisfying for the mind and body healthy for a good race at a public park? Perhaps our view of life is so limited that not conceive a contempt for others, be it human or animal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment