Invito a leggere questo intervento sul sito del Prof. Biuso.
The idea of \u200b\u200bmusic poetry is not new and has sometimes created nice pieces, in which the melody and words intertwined enhance each other. But vulgarly commercial operation, aimed at even more lazy minds of young students, can never produce such beauty. At most it can come out a vulgar pop that lacks the poetry of his artistic dimension. Personally, the songs reminded me of the soldiers fire in "Fahrenheit 451".
The objectives of the operation according to the website Orofino productions are:
OBJECTIVES
1Valorizzazione half of today's literary place in a secondary position compared to the prose and the novel;
2Valorizzare the unitary knowledge by linking the disciplines of music and literary and historical-environmental permit by the choice of poems belonging to the literary heritage;
3Contribuire in to use language creatively;
4Ampliare the lexicon;
5Scoprire the relationship of meaning and sound between words;
6Esprimere feelings and perceptions through music and words, through music
7Scoprire the logical connections between words;
8Far known poets and poetry.
Just listen to the songs to understand that the result not only contradicts the premise, but in steps 2, 5 and 7 seems to prove the opposite. With this
operation are devalued the efforts of teachers in music education, which in just three years should provide an opportunity for students to learn about different genres of music from the radio standardization. The poem is reduced to shreds, flattened background music decontestualizzante. What conclusion can be drawn
students except that they are not smart enough to face the difficulties of language? Or that poetry is something originally abstruse, but it can be simplified with a song?
Beyond the rhetoric of (pseudo) educational, the real target is once again the intellectual impoverishment, seeking to create a dictatorship of consent.
0 comments:
Post a Comment